26.10.04cutting, boredOf juice channels I sing- the saga of Henckels Birch Cutting Board
Posted by monk at 13:01
| Comments (4)
25.10.04Shortest late-nite talk show monologue joke everAl Qaqaa. *Straighten tie, pull on lapels, rock back and forth on heels*
Posted by monk at 10:56
| Comments (0)
22.10.04say anythingScotty McClellan on Congress and the flu vaccine: Q What kind of message does it send -- I noticed in The Post today, the article about the doctors on the Hill urging members to get their flu shot when the President says he's not getting it, and urging healthy Americans not to, that our congressional and Senate leaders are being told to get it? MR. McCLELLAN: The White House is following the CDC guidelines. It's my understanding that the entire executive branch is following the guidelines put out by the CDC. The President -- Q What are they? MR. McCLELLAN: Well, that the vaccine should be going to those who are most vulnerable, our seniors and our children below a certain age. And that's what the President believes, and that's what Secretary Thompson has been talking about along with Julie Gerberding and Dr. Fauci. And so the President believes that that's where the focus should be and that's where those -- those who don't need it should not be getting the vaccine. We had a manufacturing problem. Q What about -- MR. McCLELLAN: Well, you heard the President. He said, I -- he said he's not going to get one this year because he doesn't fall into the category. Q That wasn't the question. MR. McCLELLAN: Hang on. Hang on. I'm talking. He -- the President -- the CDC set out clear guidelines for who falls in the most vulnerable population that ought to be getting the vaccines that we have. And this administration took the lead to make sure that we were taking strong steps when it comes to flu preparedness. That's why we stockpiled antiviral medicines for those who do get sick. That's why we increased funding from less that $40 million to, in the '05 budget, more than $280 million for flu preparedness. And we had a manufacturing problem. And that's why the administration is prioritizing who should get those vaccines. And the President believes that those who don't need the vaccine should not be getting them. Q Do we have enough vaccine? MR. McCLELLAN: Yes, Secretary Thompson actually talked about that. He believes -- Secretary Thompson believes that we do. We're working to get additional vaccines, as well; in discussions with others to get additional vaccines. But we already have, I think it's 35 million vaccines that are available. I think there are more than 10 to 14, 15 million, I think, on the way. And he does believe there are enough there for those who are in that most vulnerable population. Q Does the White House think members of Congress should get the flu vaccine, yes or no? MR. McCLELLAN: I think I just stated the President's view -- Q Not on that question -- MR. McCLELLAN: -- that those who fall in the categories as defined by the CDC guidelines are the ones who ought to be getting the vaccines, and others who do not, should not be getting the vaccine. Q So are you saying that the White House believes that healthy members of Congress should not get the flu vaccine? Can we report that? MR. McCLELLAN: I stated our view. I think it's more broadly than that. I'm talking broadly about the entire population in America, in the President's view. And that's why he -- he stated that the other day. Q So you won't respond to whether they should get it or not? MR. McCLELLAN: I'm talking about the entire population in America, that the vaccines ought to go to those that are -- that are defined in the CDC guidelines. Q Should members of Congress live by the CDC guidelines? MR. McCLELLAN: We think everybody should follow the CDC guidelines. And if you -- if you meet those guidelines, everybody -- that's everybody, Ron. Q Why won't you say it includes Congress? MR. McCLELLAN: I said, everybody, and so I did answer your question. Q So we can -- we can write that -- MR. McCLELLAN: You can ask the question a million times. I said, everybody. Q Can we report that the President wants members of Congress who are healthy not to have the flu vaccine? MR. McCLELLAN: The President believes that those who the CDC defines as the most vulnerable ought to be the ones who get the vaccines, and those who don't fall in that criteria should not get the vaccines. Q I have a barrel of monkeys. Some of the monkeys are wearing blue fezzes, and some of the monkeys are wearing red fezzes. Are my monkeys cute? Mr. McClellan: Yes, your monkeys are cute. Q: All my monkeys? Mr. M: All monkeys are cute. Q: Including my monkeys? MM: Yes. Q: All of my monkeys? Eminem: Yes. Q: Are the monkeys with the blue fezzes cute? SM: I think I've answered your question. Q: You said all my monkeys were cute- S&M: Yes. Q:-but that wasn't my question. Are you willing to say that the monkeys with the blue fezzes are cute? Shmoo: Monkeys are cute. That's what I'm saying. Q: The ones with the blue fezzes? Scom: Monkeys- Q: the ones with the blue fezzes are monkeys- Screw Me: Our position is that monkeys are cute. Q: WHY WON'T YOU SAY THAT MONKEYS WITH BLUE FEZZES ARE CUTE? Sketchy McLugNut: I don't know, it's crazy ain't it?
Posted by monk at 12:34
| Comments (0)
20.10.0415.10.04BOB: The Pope's all over you. Are you afrighted? JOHN: As a Catholic, yes. As a playa, no.Broadway B makes with the funny at Titivil with a dramatization of the debate. Not that it wasn't plenty dramatic already!
Posted by monk at 09:03
| Comments (0)
14.10.04monk summarizes debate #3
Oh, and Bush said something about "Paygo", who if memory serves me correctly was a character in Barbarella. I think it was code for the Hanoi Jane thing.
Posted by monk at 10:13
| Comments (0)
debate surveyHow would you describe Bush's mouth last night?
Posted by monk at 10:06
| Comments (4)
"Gosh, I just don't think I ever said I'm not worried about Osama Bin Laden"Well, GOSH. Let me remind you. Gee Whiz.
Posted by monk at 08:23
| Comments (1)
13.10.04war is zellMy right-wing pen pal sent me this Op-Ed by Zell Miller from the Washington Times, with this introduction:
It shows the nature of these people.
Cutie (audible gasp): "How horrible!" This piece drives a point home with surgical precision. That point? Zell Miller is fucking crazy! Not that we didn't already know that, but Christ on a Bicycle, this guy's out where the busses don't run! He's crazier than crazy pie! He's crazier than Crazy McNutjob riding a crazy bicycle down Crazy Street delivering the Crazy Times! I think Zell Miller oughta be a new euphemism for someone who's lost their minds:
Posted by monk at 08:18
| Comments (0)
12.10.04Buttrey, toast or enough with the double entendre already!The only man who could honestly say "I played drums on Linda Rondstadt's Silk Purse" is dead. I'm imagining a conversation in a bar:
Posted by monk at 13:48
| Comments (0)
the worst part is......Catholics aren't even allowed to bash the bishop(s).
Posted by monk at 12:59
| Comments (0)
11.10.04is that a listening device or are you just happy to see me?This headline oughta help get out the female vote (and maybe those log cabin Republicans):
Posted by monk at 08:27
| Comments (0)
08.10.04should we be talking about log cabin democrats?In the veep debate I was disappointed to say the least (okay, nauseated) by the discussion of gay marriage. The whole touchy-feely act between Cheney and Edwards was a smokescreen to conceal the fact that they both support a discriminatory policy. Edwards repeated at least twice that both he and Kerry believe that "marriage is bewteen a man and a woman", and his only argument against a constitutional ban on gay marriage is that it is "unnecessary". In other words, since each state is free to discriminate against gays, there's no reason for the federal government to intervene.
Posted by monk at 08:33
| Comments (2)
06.10.04next you're going to tell me those x-ray spex don't really see through clothes!Being a fan of comic books is not just about reading the latest adventures of Batman or Spider-Man. Comics, now an art form in its own right, can cover everything from crime noir to global espionage. OH MY GOD! Look- at this point (and by "at this point" I mean "after,oh, 1972") any editor worth his suspenders should be saying to any "journalist" to whom he assigns a comics-related piece: (via Old Hag)
Posted by monk at 16:00
| Comments (0)
Move over Sylvia Plath, here comes Mary Beth CahillMove over, Sylvia Plath? Why, you need to bake some cookies? HAHAHAHAHA!
Only a few hours left The reviews are in
Posted by monk at 14:46
| Comments (1)
good news! good news!Fisherman hauls in rare and elusive White Lobster.
Posted by monk at 13:37
| Comments (0)
teh?Okay- I've been trying to figure this out for, geez, a year or two? And I've been too embarrassed to ask as it seems that everyone knows but me and it must be somehow obvious, but what in the hell does "teh" mean? For a long time I thought people were just typing "the" really fast and not bothering to correct it. But I don't think so. I'm guessing it's some sort of acronymical chat-speak. I'm teh confused. Did I at least use it right? And how do you pronounce it?
Posted by monk at 11:34
| Comments (2)
frequent masterful debatersOne of the challenges of this campaign for the Democrats has been, to put it bluntly, a pretty stupid electorate. Let's face it, folks- if you're still even slightly leaning toward voting for Bush, you're either a millionaire or a box of rocks. Case in point, this undecided's reaction to last night's veep debate: "I'm confused. They were both so convincing, but it's hard to know who was right," said Marcia Vinick, an uncommitted voter from Scotia, New York, who told The Associated Press that she went into the debate leaning toward voting for President Bush. "I think Cheney is maybe more dignified in his approach. I found Edwards was more defensive. He was talking a lot more, trying to be more convincing. I like what he said. They were both good speakers." Woah! Marcia, Marcia, Marcia! Do me a favor- stay home on election day. Oh, and can I come by and show you some brochures I have for this Florida swampland? "I wish the tickets were flipped, that these guys would be at the top because these are two masterful debaters," Ahem. Masterful debaters. Try not to say that too fast, Jim.
Posted by monk at 10:56
| Comments (0)
01.10.04help me out hereWas I imagining things last night, or did G.W. say "let me finish" when his light was still green? Do you think he forgot that the lights were on the front of the podium and he thought it would make it look like he was running out of time?
Posted by monk at 12:44
| Comments (0)
all they wanna do is zum-a-zum-zum-zum and a-boom-boomAs if Rochester doesn't have a self-esteem problem already, the city's business leaders recently formed a group "to initiate a community dialogue about the challenges we face, and to construct an action plan for more efficient government". Members of The Rump Group value independent thought. For that reason, we chose our name from The Rump Parliament, which served England in the mid-17th century. That group served during a time of transition and economic difficulty. Yeah, well I'm sure that's what will immediately leap to mind when people hear news reports about "The Rump Group".
Posted by monk at 10:47
| Comments (0)
| ![]() |