The Monk Bought Lunch

finding neverland

I don't make it a habit to comment on the outcome of celebrity trials. A trial is not a public referendum, it's a forum in which one's guilt or lack thereof is decided by a jury of your peers based on the evidence, which is supposed to be convincing beyond a reasonable doubt. So when a jury acquits somebody, they're not saying he/she is innocent; they're saying that the evidence was not sufficient to convince them beyond a reasonable doubt. When said jury has reached their verdict, my opinion of the accused's guilt or innocence is not only boring but irrelevant.
Having said that, where do you find a jury of MJ's peers? Wouldn't it look something like this?
Har har, Michael Jackson is weird, dontchaknow.