June 16, 2003Smoke this.Without going into a boring diatribe about our current tax system and our current administration's tax agenda, let me simply be clear that I am not anti-taxation. I am in no way opposed to the taxing of cigarettes or any other good or service that I purchase. My argument is not about the existence of a cigarette tax, but the way cigarettes have been singled out as a quickie means of generating extra revenue --from citizens least able to afford it-- each time the state legislature has a bill to pay. Head over to the CDC and do a little research. You will find data you may be familiar with; the majority of smokers in America are below or hovering around the poverty line, are mostly non-white, and have only a high-school or GED equivalent level of education. Also (according to statistics) people trying to quit have less success if they are poor, of color, and undereducated. Given these facts, how can our state even pretend that the body of laws concerning tobacco sale and use are anything other than blatantly biased against the poor. Punishing an already disenfranchised group for using a mass-produced, mass marketed, legal consumable --whose proceeds bankroll the punisher's political campaigns-- is beyond disgusting. As much as smoking is detested by many, a thoughtful person might wonder where the slippery slope of class-biased legislation may lead. Maybe some like to watch our government continue to enact legislation that clearly targets people of color and the poor, but I can't stomach it. If you agree please make the following (rich,white, non-smoking) men aware of your opinion: George Pataki Arthur J. Roth, commissioner of taxation and finance
| ![]() |